Name: Brede Paulsen Hangeland




Country: Norway
Club: Fulham F.C.
Position: *CB
Side: RF/BS
Age: 27-31 years (20/06/1981)

Height: 199 cm
Weight: 91 kg


Attack: 63
Defence: 85
Balance: 93
Stamina: 79
Top Speed: 74
Acceleration: 71
Response: 82
Agility: 67
Dribble Accuracy: 72
Dribble Speed: 70
Short Pass Accuracy: 73
Short Pass Speed: 74
Long Pass Accuracy: 75
Long Pass Speed: 77
Shot Accuracy: 61
Shot Power: 82
Shot Technique: 64
Free Kick Accuracy: 60
Curling: 62
Header: 85
Jump: 80
Technique: 71
Aggression: 63
Mentality: 78
Goalkeeper Skills: 50
Team Work: 79

Injury Tolerance: A
Condition: 8
Weak Foot Accuracy: 5
Weak Foot Frequency: 5
Consistency: 6
Growth type: Standard

CARDS:
S07 - Man Marking
S09 - Covering

SPECIAL ABILITIES: Marking - Covering

Attack/Defence Awareness Card: Defence Minded


INFO:
Hangeland is a former centre back. His career began in 2001 at Viking, where he played 159 matches in five seasons. He then played 91 games for København from 2005 and 2008. He eventually transferred to England, becoming a key player and legend at Fulham, where he made 270 appearances and scored 12 goals from 2008 and 2014. He retired two years later after a spell at Crystal Palace. He capped for Norway 91 times.
A very tall, strong and imposing defender, Hangeland was also known for his composure. He used his size to mark his opponent and cover the ground. Thanks to his height combined with a good jump, he was excellent in the air in the defence as much as he was in the attack. In fact, he was always in the opposition's penalty area during set pieces. Moreover, he could deliver nice long passes from the back.

Updated.

I'd reduce era to 2008-2012 , and why did you give him CON 6? During this period, he played over 40 games in every season,and twice even over 50. I'd give him CON 8 without any doubt.

And isn't RES a bit low? Also, I'd give him 85 for DEF,but bear in mind that I haven't watched him for a while so it doesn't necessarilly mean that I'm right.

The 6 in condition is probably due to the fact that I considered also the 2012-13 season. Still he probably should've had 7. Changing the era to 2008-2012 he surely needs 8 then.
About DEF my choice was either 84 or 85 but then I decided to make the set focused more on the strength. 85 is fine by the way, so I'll raise it up by one.
Regarding RES, doesn't it include also being faster than the opponent on taking the ball? He's very tall and has good aerial abilities, so it's difficult to beat him in the air. When the ball is on the ground, he doesn't seem too fast but he could rather catch the ball thanks to his long body. Anyway, do you think 82 would be more fair?

Yes, his reactions when taking the ball away. I'd rather raise it by point or two, nothing significant.

Updated: DEF 84 --> 85, RES 80 --> 82, COND 6 --> 8 and era reduced to 2008-2012.

And era reduction