It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:49 am



Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
 Sol CAMPBELL 2002-2004 
Author Message

Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:48 pm
Posts: 289
Name: Sulzeer Jeremiah Campbell

Nickname: "Sol"

Image

Country: :ENG: England
Club: Arsenal
Position: *CB
Side: RB/BS
Age: 28-30 years (18/09/1974)

Height: 188 cm
Weight: 93 kg

Attack: 57
Defence: 89
Balance: 96
Stamina: 79
Top Speed: 84
Acceleration: 75
Response: 83
Agility: 67
Dribble Accuracy: 70
Dribble Speed: 73
Short Pass Accuracy: 73
Short Pass Speed: 78
Long Pass Accuracy: 72
Long Pass Speed: 77
Shot Accuracy: 62
Shot Power: 88
Shot Technique: 64
Free Kick Accuracy: 64
Curling: 60
Header: 86
Jump: 85
Technique: 72
Aggression: 60
Mentality: 82
Goalkeeper Skills: 50
Team Work: 78

Injury Tolerance: B
Condition: 7
Weak Foot Accuracy: 4
Weak Foot Frequency: 5
Consistency: 7
Growth Type: Standard/Lasting

CARDS:
S07 – Man Marking
S08 – Slide Tackle

SPECIAL ABILITIES: Marking - Sliding

Attack/Defence Awareness Card:
Defence Minded


Last edited by Il Maestro on Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:21 pm, edited 3 times in total.



Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:13 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:54 pm
Posts: 1286
Well some aspects , maybe are a little bid high like STA and BB.
I suggest 95-96 in BB , Ibra was more strong that him.
And 78-79 in STA like's in he's PES default value, wich is very accurate.


Last edited by TheGreatRossonero on Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:21 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:46 am
Posts: 82
Location: In a place on the center-south of Chile
TheGreatRossonero wrote:
Well some aspects , maybebare little bid high like STA and BB.
I suggest 95-96 in BB , Ibra was more strong that him.
And 78-79 in STA like's in he's PES default value, wich is very accurate.


97 is his standard value. Also, Zlatan weight is 95 kg, so he's powerful than him :mrgreen:
The STA in PES 5 is 80. I think is more accurate.

_________________
Spoiler: show
Image


Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:28 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 3362
Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
I would say that maybe a short era (2002-2005) would be more accurate, he wasn't that good past 2005, even he was benched by someone like Cygan..

Also he was affected by several injuries during that time so IT: B is not very accurate if you still want to keep the current era..


Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:45 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:54 pm
Posts: 1286
Well i Still , defend the 96-95 in BB he was Strong but for that level.

PES 6 and 2008 Give's him 78-79 and also in the games that i see from him in Arsenal era was not exactly a great fitness profile of Player.


Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:46 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 3362
Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
Well, maybe 80 may be good enough ;)

And regarding BB, i wouldn't mind keep the current value, he's surely one of the strongest defenders ever, on pair with Kohler and Stam..


Last edited by El Capo on Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:50 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:46 am
Posts: 82
Location: In a place on the center-south of Chile
Image changed
STA 82>80
IT B>C
And short the era
Any another suggestion? :3

EDIT: for his prime era (98-02) i think in 92 in DEF, 83-84 in STA was the only change. What you think about this?

_________________
Spoiler: show
Image


Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:52 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 3362
Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
Well, since you reduced the era, the IT can go back to B ;)


Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:20 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:46 am
Posts: 82
Location: In a place on the center-south of Chile
Well, back to B XD

_________________
Spoiler: show
Image


Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:21 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 4:26 am
Posts: 3362
Location: Aragua De Barcelona, Venezuela
Il Maestro wrote:
for his prime era (98-02) i think in 92 in DEF, 83-84 in STA was the only change. What you think about this?



For now, i agree with STA at 83, but i don't know about DEF, for example Terry has 89 here, and i don't think Campbell was far better than Terry.


Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:37 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2016 7:46 am
Posts: 82
Location: In a place on the center-south of Chile
El Capo wrote:
Il Maestro wrote:
for his prime era (98-02) i think in 92 in DEF, 83-84 in STA was the only change. What you think about this?



For now, i agree with STA at 83, but i don't know about DEF, for example Terry has 89 here, and i don't think Campbell was far better than Terry.


Terry in my OF has 93 :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

_________________
Spoiler: show
Image


Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:00 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 11 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software for PTF.