Author |
Message |
Interista93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 am Posts: 4289
|
Last edited by Interista93 on Tue Nov 22, 2022 1:39 pm, edited 14 times in total.
|
Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:20 am |
|
|
Interista93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 am Posts: 4289
|
Is it normal for an All Star team to have 29 defenders and 6 goalkeepers in reserves and only 5 defenders in the first squad?
|
Fri Sep 06, 2019 4:51 pm |
|
|
StuartBannigan
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:43 pm Posts: 1534
|
Interista93 wrote: Is it normal for an All Star team to have 29 defenders and 6 goalkeepers in reserves and only 5 defenders in the first squad? Nope, a few of DimonSpa's teams are like that including Ukraine All Stars, they should probably be remade to fit the same standards as all the other teams.
|
Fri Sep 06, 2019 5:14 pm |
|
|
gurkenjoe93
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:38 pm Posts: 2475
|
StuartBannigan wrote: Interista93 wrote: Is it normal for an All Star team to have 29 defenders and 6 goalkeepers in reserves and only 5 defenders in the first squad? Nope, a few of DimonSpa's teams are like that including Ukraine All Stars, they should probably be remade to fit the same standards as all the other teams. Those teams had those standards in the past before this clown decided to totally fuck them up But I agree, those teams should all be revamped.
|
Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:36 pm |
|
|
DimonSpa
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:31 am Posts: 211 Location: Zhlobin, Belarus
|
Update 2 + 7 + 7 + 7. Added some players to the reserve given the time of my absence. 23 players of the main team + 77 in reserve, for the TOP-100.
|
Sat May 30, 2020 9:01 pm |
|
|
Interista93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 am Posts: 4289
|
This, of course, is just my opinion and I don't want to start an argument but I think there's no need to have so many players in reserves. Goalkeepers are usually 3 or 4 if available while other positions shouldn't have so many playerss either. I don't know most of these players so I can't tell who should stay and who shouldn't. However I consider for example Vidić: two seasons, only one as probably regular starter, a total of only 41 appearances and had his best time in another team. Is he really necessary? Same would surely go for many other players. Also, I wonder if you chose all the 77 reserves or you based on an online 100 best players list. If it's the first case, you surely already know who deserves more to stay in reserves.
|
Sat May 30, 2020 11:47 pm |
|
|
DimonSpa
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:31 am Posts: 211 Location: Zhlobin, Belarus
|
Interista93 wrote: This, of course, is just my opinion and I don't want to start an argument but I think there's no need to have so many players in reserves. Goalkeepers are usually 3 or 4 if available while other positions shouldn't have so many playerss either. I don't know most of these players so I can't tell who should stay and who shouldn't. However I consider for example Vidić: two seasons, only one as probably regular starter, a total of only 41 appearances and had his best time in another team. Is he really necessary? Same would surely go for many other players. Also, I wonder if you chose all the 77 reserves or you based on an online 100 best players list. If it's the first case, you surely already know who deserves more to stay in reserves. TOP-100, rules forbidden? Or what is incomprehensible?
|
Sun May 31, 2020 7:17 am |
|
|
DimonSpa
Joined: Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:31 am Posts: 211 Location: Zhlobin, Belarus
|
As for Vidic, he showed such a level of play in Spartak worthy of mentioning him in the reserve.
|
Sun May 31, 2020 7:23 am |
|
|
Interista93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 4:28 am Posts: 4289
|
DimonSpa wrote: As for Vidic, he showed such a level of play in Spartak worthy of mentioning him in the reserve. Top-100 footballers isn't forbidden. It's your team after all. It's just my opinion that 77 reserves are too much, nothing else.
|
Sun May 31, 2020 2:07 pm |
|
|
|